Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Trust Created Under Agreement by and Between Janet E. Johnson, Settlor, and Paul Johnson, ...

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 24, 2025No. a241189Published

1. The district court’s order requiring the trustee to restore real property to two family trusts is not an order that “grants, refuses, dissolves or refuses to dissolve, an injunction” under Minnesota Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 103.03(b), and therefore it is not immediately appealable under that rule. 2. The district court’s order removing the trustee from two family trusts and appointing a successor trustee is not an order that “grants, refuses, dissolves or refuses…

Read the full summary

1. The district court’s order requiring the trustee to restore real property to two family trusts is not an order that “grants, refuses, dissolves or refuses to dissolve, an injunction” under Minnesota Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 103.03(b), and therefore it is not immediately appealable under that rule. 2. The district court’s order removing the trustee from two family trusts and appointing a successor trustee is not an order that “grants, refuses, dissolves or refuses to dissolve, an injunction” under Minnesota Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 103.03(b), and therefore it is not…

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A24-1189 Court of Appeals Gaïtas, J. In the Matter of the Trust Created Under Agreement by and Between Janet E. Johnson, Settlor, and Paul Johnson, Successor Trustee, dated July 15, 1998; In the Matter of the Trust Created Under Agreement by and Between Carroll A. Johnson, Settlor, and Paul Johnson, successor Trustee, dated July 15, 1998; Nancy Patock and Susan Gerhardt, Beneficiaries, Respondents, and Filed: September 24, 2025 Office of Appellate Courts Paul Johnson, Successor Trustee, Appellant. ________________________ Cletus J. Frank, Frank Law Office,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API