Legal Opinion

Woischke v. Stursberg & Fine, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 2018No. A17-0408PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Justice.

Respondents William Woischke, Shirley Woischke, Woischke Enterprises, LLC, and Woischke Parks, LLC (collectively "Woischke") sued appellants Stursberg & Fine, Inc., Henry Stursberg, Jeremy Stursberg, and Joel Zimmerman (collectively "Stursberg") after learning that Stursberg had provided brokerage services to Woischke without the required state license. Woischke alleged, in relevant part, that the fee agreement obligating Woischke to pay for those services was void as contrary to public policy. Stursberg moved to compel arbitration in Pennsylvania pursuant to the terms of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Eckblad v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Anita J. Howard v. Shelly R. Svoboda, M.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. City of Rochester v. KottschadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gonzalez v. Hoovestol Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API