Legal Opinion
Carole v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 17, 2003No. 01-201 LPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
BUSH, Judge.
On April 5, 2001, nine named plaintiffs filed a complaint and motion for class certification in this court alleging a taking by the United States due to aircraft operations from Naval Air Station Oceana (NAS Oceana; Oceana) or Naval Auxiliary Landing Field, Fentress (NALF Fentress; Fentress). Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the use and enjoyment of their residential property has been destroyed or substantially interfered with by the operations of nine squadrons and two replacement squadrons of F/A-18 C/D aircraft, and they seek just compensation for the value of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lawrence C. Bieneman v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Biddle v. BAA Indianapolis, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.