Legal Opinion
Biddle v. BAA Indianapolis, LLC
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 2007No. 32S05-0602-CV-33PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Homeowners near Indianapolis International Airport contend that noise from airplanes passing over or near their property amounts to a taking within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment. The homeowners also say the Airport should be compelled to offer them financial settlements similar to those offered to earlier litigants. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Airport, and we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
The Appellants (“Homeowners”) 1 live in Hawthorne Ridge, a subdivision within three miles of Indianapolis International Airport. Indianapolis Airport…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Liggett v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Kimco of Evansville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.