Legal Opinion
King v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 26, 2008No. 07-589 CPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EMILY C. HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class Action (plaintiffs’ Motion or Pis.’ Mot.), filed on July 23, 2008, under Rule 23 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The complaint in this action, filed on August 2, 2007, claims that plaintiffs, FBI police officers working during at least one pay period after January 1, 2003, were denied pay and benefits mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 540C. Complaint (Compl.) 1. Plaintiffs claim that pursuant to the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (2006), they are entitled to compensation,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Sabo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Fauvergue v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Rasmuson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.