Legal Opinion

Litz v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 27, 1997No. 36, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The primary issue we must decide in this case is whether the “business pursuits” exclusion in a homeowner’s liability insurance policy relieves the insurer from its duty to defend an innocent spouse who does not participate in the business pursuit of the other spouse against a suit brought by a third party who allegedly suffered injuries arising out of the business pursuit.

I

This appeal arises out of a declaratory judgment action filed by Respondent, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) to determine its obligation to defend and indemnify Petitioners, David and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Mesmer v. Maryland Automobile Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Walk v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Megonnell v. United States Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API