Legal Opinion

Walk v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 16, 2004No. 110, September Term, 2003PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

This appeal arises out of an action filed in the Circuit Court for Howard County by Richard Walk against Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (“Hartford”) alleging breach of contract and seeking damages as a result of Hartford’s refusal to defend Walk in a lawsuit which had been filed against him. The Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer, finding no duty to defend because neither the allegations in the underlying action against Walk, nor the extrinsic evidence submitted by Walk, were sufficient to generate a potentiality of coverage under Hartford’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Cheney v. Bell National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. PryseskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Rohrbeck v. RohrbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Livesay v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Blackstone International Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API