Legal Opinion

People v. Duty

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 1969No. Crim. 4802PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

After Barbara Jenner had been convicted of arson in wilfully setting fire to her home, a jury found defendant Earl Duty guilty as an accessory to Mrs. Jenner’s crime. He appeals from the judgment.

Penal Code section 32 defines an “accessory” as follows: “Every person who, after a felony has been committed, harbors, conceals or aids a principal in such felony, with the intent that said principal may avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction or punishment, having knowledge that said principal has committed such felony or has been charged with such felony or convicted thereof, is an…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. NucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. Vela PradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API