Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal from-summary judgment in which the district court ruled in favor of the respondent underinsured motorist (UIM) insurer, appellant argues the district court erred in concluding that: (a) respondent’s “timely notice” clause was enforceable under Malmin, when respondent failed to demonstrate prejudice from its lack of ability to intervene; and (b) appellant’s Schmidt notice was fatally defective when appellant put forth sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment on the issue of prejudice. We affirm.
FACTS'
Appellant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016