Legal Opinion

Kluball v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 2005No. A05-436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

On appeal from-summary judgment in which the district court ruled in favor of the respondent underinsured motorist (UIM) insurer, appellant argues the district court erred in concluding that: (a) respondent’s “timely notice” clause was enforceable under Malmin, when respondent failed to demonstrate prejudice from its lack of ability to intervene; and (b) appellant’s Schmidt notice was fatally defective when appellant put forth sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment on the issue of prejudice. We affirm.

FACTS'

Appellant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API