Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court granted summary judgment dismissing Tena Van Kampen’s underinsured-motorist (UIM) claims because she failed to protect her UIM insurers’ subrogation rights when she entered into a joint settlement under which her daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren received the limits of the at-fault driver’s liability policy and Van Kampen received no payment. Because Van Kampen did not forfeit her right to UIM coverage, and because a genuine issue of material fact remains on whether the UIM insurers were prejudiced by inadequate notice of the settlement, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. BaumannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woznicki v. GEICO Morse v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Waring v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Woznicki v. GEICO Morse v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015