Legal Opinion

Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 2008No. A07-1457PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

The district court granted summary judgment dismissing Tena Van Kampen’s underinsured-motorist (UIM) claims because she failed to protect her UIM insurers’ subrogation rights when she entered into a joint settlement under which her daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren received the limits of the at-fault driver’s liability policy and Van Kampen received no payment. Because Van Kampen did not forfeit her right to UIM coverage, and because a genuine issue of material fact remains on whether the UIM insurers were prejudiced by inadequate notice of the settlement, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. BaumannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woznicki v. GEICO Morse v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Waring v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Woznicki v. GEICO Morse v. Erie InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API