Sota Foods, Inc. v. Larson-Peterson & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant City of Park Rapids and respondent Larson-Peterson & Associates, Inc., both challenge the trial court’s denial of their respective defense motions for summary judgment. The motions were based on claims of discretionary immunity. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
In the late 1970’s appellant City of Park Rapids (the city) began a process to upgrade its wastewater treatment facility. Respondent Larson-Peterson & Associates, an engineering firm, (the engineers) was retained by the city in connection with this project. Thomas Augustin was head engineer on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Anderson v. City of HopkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buck v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Buck v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000