Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City of Hopkins

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 19, 1986No. C2-86-899PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is a civil rights action brought by plaintiff against the City of Hopkins and two of its police officers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants moved for summary judgment claiming that they were immune from suit under their qualified immunity recognized in Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982). The trial court denied the motion. Relying on Mitchell v. Forsyth, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985), defendants appealed from the order denying summary judgment. The Court of Appeals granted the plaintiffs motion to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. GwaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Carrillo v. RostroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API