Buck v. Freeman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentAmundson, Judge
I. Common Law Remedy As Affected By Statute
The majority has crafted a well-reasoned affirmance of the district court’s actions. I concur with much of its logic, but have reservations about not applying Minnesota’s own exclusive remedy statute, Minn.Stat. § 176.031 (1998), and Minnesota’s third-party liability statute, Minn.Stat. § 176.061 (1998), as written, but choosing instead to follow what it perceived to be a clear pattern in the statute granting immunity from suit to workers’ compensation insurance carriers. Legislative trends should have no bearing on interpretation of the existing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Fabricius v. Montgomery Elevator CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Kifer v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Donnelly v. Minneapolis Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.