Legal Opinion
Adams v. Frankel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 22, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Martin J. Frankel appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated May 24, 1996, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in concluding that the continuous treatment doctrine tolled the 2½-year Statute of Limitations for claims sounding in medical malpractice (see, CPLR 214-a). Here, the “continuing trust and confidence” which underlies…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. OrentreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Miller v. RivardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Bartolo v. MonacoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Robertson v. BozzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robertson v. BozzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Dolfini v. MorillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Zelig v. UrkenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- McCoy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Venson v. DaunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.