Legal Opinion

Miller v. Rivard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1992PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Levine, J.

In this action, plaintiffs, John Miller and Sharon Miller, have sued defendant Capital Area Community Health Plan Inc. (hereinafter CHP) and its physician/employee, defendant Donald Rivard, for various damages arising out of the conception and subsequent birth of a normal, healthy child in January 1989. The gravamen of their suit is what courts and commentators have come to call "wrongful conception” or "wrongful pregnancy”, i.e., the negligent performance of a sterilization or abortion procedure by a physician, or the negligent filling of a contraceptive…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Bovsun v. SanperiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tenuto v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Dorking Genetics v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Dorking Genetics v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. Fox v. MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Millard v. CorradoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API