Legal Opinion

Venson v. Daun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about September 30, 1999, which granted the motion of defendants Greta Daun, M.D., and New York Medical College for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the complaint reinstated.

Contrary to the conclusion reached by Supreme Court, the “ ‘continuing trust and confidence’ ” that underlies the continuous treatment doctrine (Richardson v Orentreich, 64 NY2d 896, 898) did not end on October 12, 1989, when defendant, Dr. Daun,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Richardson v. OrentreichNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Keith v. SchulmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Adams v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Irizarry v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bruno v. GosyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. McCoy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API