Legal Opinion
McCoy v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), dated May 7, 2003, as, upon determining that the continuous treatment doctrine was not applicable, in effect, denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to file a late notice of claim with respect to the causes of action accruing before December 4, 2001, and (2) so much of an order of the same court dated January 22, 2004, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Couch v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Keith v. SchulmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pannell v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Chkhartishvili v. VolovoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Little v. Nassau Health Care Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Carter v. Broome CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019