Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Orentreich

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1985PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Plaintiff first came under defendant’s medical care in January 1973 and received periodic treatments through October 8, 1974, the date of her last visit to his office. At that time, plaintiff was given an appointment for December 4, 1974, which, however, she failed to keep. The appointment was never rescheduled and defendant did not have any further contact with plaintiff.

This action was commenced on November 30, 1977. Plaintiff sought to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Davis v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Coyne v. BersaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Rizk v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Cox v. Kingsboro Medical GroupNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Allende v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1997

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API