Legal Opinion

Stuthman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1933No. 9705PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

This is an action on a contract of war risk insurance, in which the pleadings are in conventional form.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

After a jury had been impaneled and sworn, one of plaintiff’s attorneys made an opening statement of the case to the jury, reciting that before the war plaintiff was an able-bodied man, able to do the hardest kind of farm work; that he enlisted in the service, was sent to Fort Riley, Kan. and then transferred to Camp Cody, at Deming, N. M.; that he took out a policy of war risk insurance, the premiums…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Brashear v. RabensteinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Coffeyville Mining & Gas Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Redding v. Puget Sound Iron & Steel WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Stewart v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  2. Sheila Ilina Boland, Etc. v. J. Spencer LoveCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Thomas Edward Hanley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. McGuire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  5. Wilkey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API