Legal Opinion
North Confidence Mining & Development Co. v. Morrice
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1922No. Civ. No. 2381PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought to cancel a certain option or agreement for the sale of real property, and plaintiff had judgment from which the appeal is taken upon the judgment-roll. The instrument which the court ordered canceled, as far as necessary to quote, is in the following form:
“This agreement made and entered into this 3rd day of June, 1919, by and between North Confidence Mining and Development Company, a corporation, the party of the first part and George Morrice, of the County of Tuolumne, State of California, the party of the second part witnesseth: That for and in consideration of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Clarno v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Tanforan v. TanforanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Acme Oil and Mining Co. v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Marin Water & Power Co. v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- In re ChrismanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- Minner v. SadlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Francisco & Ellington, Inc. v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926