State v. . Tate
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Cline, J., at January Term, 1915, of Hat-wood.
1Opinion of the Court
CiARK, 0. J.
The defendants were indicted for fornication and adultery under Revisal, 3350, in the police court of Waynesville, and adjudged guilty. On appeal to the Superior Court, they were tried before a jury, who found them guilty.
The first exception is because, the defendants having objected to permitting one Flora Franklin to testify because of mental incapacity, the court, after questioning the witness, who was also questioned by the counsel for the defendants and by the solicitor, found as a fact that she was competent to testify. In S. v. Perry, 44 N. C., 330, where the same objection…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. Shine.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- State v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . ManuelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. . MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. . CambySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.