Legal Opinion
State v. Thomas
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 19, 1952No. 295PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
73 S.E.2d 283 (1952)
236 N.C. 454
STATE
v.
THOMAS.
No. 295.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
November 19, 1952.
Harry McMullan, Atty. Gen., T. W. Bruton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert L. Emanuel, Member of Staff, Raleigh, for the State.
C. W. Beaman, Snow Hill, for the defendant, appellant.
ERVIN, Justice.
The defendant asserts that his conviction and sentence in the superior court are invalid because he was tried upon the original warrant rather than upon an indictment found by a grand jury.
When the representatives of the freemen of North Carolina met in convention at Halifax in 1776 to frame a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Lewis v. . Commissioners of WakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. EfflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.