State v. Shine.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN tried before Long, J., and a jury, August Criminal Term, 1908, of Union. Defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Clare, O. J.
The defendant was tried in tbe Superior Court upon- appeal from tbe recorder’s court of Monroe. Tbe offense charged was retailing spirituous liquor. In tbe warrant, it was charged that tbe offense bad been committed unlawfully, • wilfully and “feloniously.” Tbe punishment prescribed is that of a misdemeanor (Rev. 3291) and that fixes tbe grade of tbe offense, State v. Fesperman, 108 N. C., 770; State v. Lytle, 138 N. C., 744. Tbe word “felon- iously” must therefore be treated as surplusage (State v. Edwards, 90 N. C., 710, and cases there cited) as must also the allegation that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- State v. . SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Jones v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.