Legal Opinion

State v. Shine.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1908PublishedCited by 24 opinions

ActioN tried before Long, J., and a jury, August Criminal Term, 1908, of Union. Defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Clare, O. J.

The defendant was tried in tbe Superior Court upon- appeal from tbe recorder’s court of Monroe. Tbe offense charged was retailing spirituous liquor. In tbe warrant, it was charged that tbe offense bad been committed unlawfully, • wilfully and “feloniously.” Tbe punishment prescribed is that of a misdemeanor (Rev. 3291) and that fixes tbe grade of tbe offense, State v. Fesperman, 108 N. C., 770; State v. Lytle, 138 N. C., 744. Tbe word “felon- iously” must therefore be treated as surplusage (State v. Edwards, 90 N. C., 710, and cases there cited) as must also the allegation that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. State v. . SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. State v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Jones v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. State v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API