Legal Opinion

Duggan v. Byrolly Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 14, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The court’s finding of certain facts, and its conclusions that the plaintiff Duggan was free from contributory negligence, that the defendant was negli gent, and that this negligence caused the damage to the plaintiffs, are the errors assigned upon this appeal. No change can be made in the finding which could materially affect the issues decisive thereof.

The finding discloses these material facts: About three o’clock on the afternoon of November 27th, 1934, a clear dry day, Duggan was driving his employer’s small bakery delivery truck southerly in Wallingford on the state highway from Meriden…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Waterbury Horse R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  2. Duffee v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Rozycki v. Yantic Grain & Products Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Rose v. CampitelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. Cooley v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. In Re Application of DoddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  4. Horton v. VickersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. Jacen v. Town of East HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API