Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Dodd

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 28, 1945PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment admitting the applicant to the bar of Connecticut without examination. The five assignments of error amount to a claim that neither the record as a whole nor the report of the committee on recommendations for admission to the bar in particular shows that the applicant has actually practiced for ten years in the highest court of original jurisdiction in South Dakota, as § 8 of the Practice Book requires in his case.

The candidate’s application for admission to the bar, signed by him, contains the following statements of fact, admitted to be true for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. O'brien's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  3. Eley v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Grievance Comm., Bar of New Haven County v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Heiberger v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. State v. CarboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Brooks v. LawsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. In Re Application of GriffithsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Bysiewicz v. DinardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API