Legal Opinion
Horton v. Vickers
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 1, 1955PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
These two cases were tried together. In one the plaintiff, Lillian S. Horton, claimed damages for injuries alleged to have been caused by the malpractice of Dr. J. Leonard Vickers. In the other, brought by her husband, Edmund P. Horton, against the same defendant, damages were claimed for the loss of her society and services and for expenses incurred and to be incurred in an effort to cure her injuries. His right of recovery, if any, was limited to reimbursement for expenses incurred by him by reason of his wife’s injury. Beckert v. Doble, 105 Conn. 88, 91, 134 A. 154; Marri v. Stamford…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marri v. Stamford Street Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Freund v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Geraty v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Force v. GregorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Eastern Sportswear Co. v. S. Augstein & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Shilkret v. Annapolis Emergency Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Fitzmaurice v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Downer v. VeilleuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.