Rosenblatt v. Berman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiff brought this action alleging that the defendants, Gertrude Berman and Louis Rundbaken, acting as real estate agents, had conspired to cheat and defraud him in the sale of real estate owned by him. The case was tried to the jury. The plaintiff had a verdict for $2112.24 which the trial court, upon the defendants’ motion, refused to set aside. The defendants have appealed, assigning errors in the denial of their motion and in the court’s charge. With respect to the former, they make the claim, among others, that the amount of the damages fixed by the jury was not supported by the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Lengel v. New Haven Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Stetson v. StindtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Larimer v. PlatteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Karp v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.