Legal Opinion
City of South Euclid v. Clapacs
South Euclid Municipal Court
Decided February 7, 1966No. Nos. 8268, 8269, and 8270PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.
The affidavit in case No. 8268 reads as follows:
“Before me, Marjorie M. Walters, Clerk of South Euclid Municipal Court, personally appeared Yetta Naftulin, * * * who being duly sworn according to law, deposes and says, that on or about the 8th day of July, 1965, at the City of South Euclid, in said County and State, one, Daniel Clapacs, * * * committed an assault and battery on Jan Naftulin and Joel Briskey, then and there being in violation of Section 513.01 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of South Euclid, Ohio in violation of law, and further says not.
* ‘ (Affiant) Yetta Naftulin.
“Swo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SteeleOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Columbus v. GlennOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- State v. GutillaOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- City of Columbus v. MeadleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
- City of Toledo v. MiscikowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. Iowa State Highway Commission Ex Rel. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Fraser v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- State v. BiedenharnOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- City of Cleveland v. WeaverCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 1983