State v. Gutilla
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, J.
The defendant was charged, tried, convicted and sentenced in the Municipal Court of the City of Columbus, Ohio, for the illegal practice of medicine.
Thirteen errors are assigned to the judgment. We will not set them out or consider them in detail, but coniine our opinion to those assignments which require comment.
The affidavit upon which the court took jurisdiction to try the defendant was made by Frank A. Dorsey, an inspector *290for the State Medical Board. It appears that Mr. Dorsey had no personal knowledge of the facts upon which the State rested its case against the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CollettOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
- State v. HenningOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- City of Cincinnati v. McKinneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Hexacomb Corp. v. GTW Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- City of South Euclid v. ClapacsSouth Euclid Municipal Court · 1966
- Columbus v. BaldasaroOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.