Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Meadley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1946No. 3863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, P. J.

Defendant was convicted and sentenced for possessing slips intended to be used as evidence of ownership of a number of shares in a scheme of chance in violation of Section 1089-1 of the ordinances of the City of Columbus, Ohio.

We do not state the exact offense of which the defendant was convicted because neither the affidavit nor the specific finding of the judge is in the transcript of docket and journal entries nor is it found-among the files in the case.

The appeal raises two questions, first, that the admission of evidence obtained by unlawful search and seizure…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of South Euclid v. ClapacsSouth Euclid Municipal Court · 1966
  2. Columbus v. TreadwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. State v. Miclau, Jr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API