Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 14, 1990No. 88-1466, 88-1522PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants, Bobby R. Lewis and Russell M. Fraser, appeal separately from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, R. Scott Reynolds, Gregory S. Windham, Kenneth Tichansky, and Teresa Scholz, in this action to recover damages for fraud. We affirm in part, but remand the case for a determination as to the question of excessiveness of the damages, in accordance with Hammond v. City of Gadsden,493 So.2d 1374 (Ala. 1986), and Green Oil Co. v. Hornsby,539 So.2d 218 (Ala. 1989).

This is the second time these parties have been before this Court. In Reynolds v. Mitchell, 529…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte RudolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Tatum v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. NorthingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LumpkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Environmental Systems v. Rexham Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Williston v. ArdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Alabama Dept. of Transp. v. LAND ENERGYSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. FOX ALARM CO., INC. v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API