State Ex Rel. DeWoody v. Bixler
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
"Williams, J.
The sole question presented is whether paragraph 3a of Section 6309-2, General Code, which provides for the creation of a county poor relief distributing fund is constitutional.
The respondents in each case raise the question of unconstitutionality by a general demurrer to the petition, and each petition undisputedly alleges facts sufficient to state a cause of action, provided the provision attacked is constitutional.
Paragraph 3a of Section 6309-2, General Code, provides :
“The county commissioners of any county may, by a two-thirds vote, and if the taxing authority of any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State Ex Rel. Standard Oil Co. v. CombsOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Thompson v. City of MarionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Friedlandbr v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Cooley v. ThrasherOhio Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marr v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Wirtz v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- State, Ex Rel. v. Youngs'nOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Wirtz v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Okey v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.