Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. DeWoody v. Bixler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1940No. 27773 and 27793PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Williams, J.

The sole question presented is whether paragraph 3a of Section 6309-2, General Code, which provides for the creation of a county poor relief distributing fund is constitutional.

The respondents in each case raise the question of unconstitutionality by a general demurrer to the petition, and each petition undisputedly alleges facts sufficient to state a cause of action, provided the provision attacked is constitutional.

Paragraph 3a of Section 6309-2, General Code, provides :

“The county commissioners of any county may, by a two-thirds vote, and if the taxing authority of any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. State Ex Rel. Standard Oil Co. v. CombsOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Thompson v. City of MarionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Friedlandbr v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State Ex Rel. Cooley v. ThrasherOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marr v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wirtz v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Youngs'nOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Wirtz v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Okey v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API