Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Youngs'n

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1942No. 29294PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole question raised by this appeal is whether the petition states facts which show a cause of action.

As stated by the Court of Appeals:

"What was the legislative purpose and intent in enacting General Code Sections 3391 et seq., and providing therein that such contract as the one in question might be entered into by the city and county? Was it to change the statutory provisions that each subdivision must care for its own poor?"

As phrased by appellee:

"The only question here presented is whether or not the county commissioners of a county in which a city is located may, pursuant to Sections…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Friedlandbr v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. DeWoody v. BixlerOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Turner v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. Smith v. GradyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. Peart v. SENECA COUNTYDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  4. Thacker v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State University, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1971
  5. McDonald v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API