Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Standard Oil Co. v. Combs
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1935No. 25057 and 25089PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Counsel for the relator contend that Section 189 of the Zanesville 'ordinances is constitutionally invalid for two reasons: (1) that it unlawfully prohibits the relator from devoting his premises to lawful use, and (2) that, by reason of the consent provisions contained therein, the ordinance attempts to delegate to property owners legislative power which is vested solely in municipal councils.
Upon the first proposition counsel rely upon the case of Powell v. Craig, 113 Ohio St., 245, 148 N. E., 607, where this court held in substance that a filling station, erected according to methods of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Plymouth Coal Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Consolidated Management, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Arno v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Cross v. BilettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Boothby v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
- State Ex Rel. DeWoody v. BixlerOhio Supreme Court · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.