Wirtz v. Quinn
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
¶ 1 In this appeal, plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of four public acts, Public Acts 96-34, 96-35, 96-37, and 96-38 (eff. July 13, 2009). The public acts at issue, comprising three substantive bills and one appropriation bill, were enacted as part of a "capital projects" plan and were signed into law by Governor Patrick Quinn on July 13, 2009.
¶ 2 The appellate court held that Public Act 96-34 violates the single subject clause of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 (Ill. Const. 1970, art. IV, § 8(d)), and that the three remaining public acts were invalid based on language…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- People v. BoclairIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re a MinorIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. ReedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Johnson v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Arangold Corp. v. ZehnderIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Shelby R.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
- Tillman v. PritzkerIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. Wagner v. EvnenNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Marks v. VanderventerIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
- Midwest Gaming and Entertainment, LLC v. The County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.