Legal Opinion

Wirtz v. Quinn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2011No. 111903PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

¶ 1 In this appeal, plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of four public acts, Public Acts 96-34, 96-35, 96-37, and 96-38 (eff. July 13, 2009). The public acts at issue, comprising three substantive bills and one appropriation bill, were enacted as part of a "capital projects" plan and were signed into law by Governor Patrick Quinn on July 13, 2009.

¶ 2 The appellate court held that Public Act 96-34 violates the single subject clause of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 (Ill. Const. 1970, art. IV, § 8(d)), and that the three remaining public acts were invalid based on language…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. People v. BoclairIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re a MinorIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. ReedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Johnson v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Arangold Corp. v. ZehnderIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Shelby R.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Tillman v. PritzkerIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State ex rel. Wagner v. EvnenNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Marks v. VanderventerIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Midwest Gaming and Entertainment, LLC v. The County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API