Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 9, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Douglas O’Connor, Thomas Colopy Matthew Manahan, and Elie Gurfinkel are current or former drivers who have performed services for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. Docket No. 330 (Second Amended Complaint) (SAC).1 Earlier this year, Plaintiffs moved to certify a class of approximately 160,000 other “UberBlack, UberX, and UberSUV drivers who have driven for Uber in the state of California at any time since August 16, 2009.”…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cheryl Slade v. Progressive Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Carlos Ayala v. Tapestry, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
- James v. Uber Technologies Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Waithaka v. Amazon.com IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024