Legal Opinion
James v. Uber Technologies Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 26, 2021No. 3:19-cv-06462Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHRISTOPHER JAMES, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06462-EMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS 10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., CERTIFICATION 11 Defendant. Docket No. 56 12 13 14 Plaintiffs Christopher James and Spencer Verhines are current or former Uber drivers who 15 contend that they and a putative class of approximately 4,828 other Uber drivers are Uber’s 16 employees and therefore eligible for various protections under the California Labor Code. See 17 Docket No. 81…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.