Legal Opinion
Carlos Ayala v. Tapestry, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 6, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01052Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARLOS AYALA, Case No. 24-cv-1052-BAS-BJW 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 TAPESTRY, INC., (ECF No. 39) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Carlos Ayala’s motion for class certification. 18 (ECF No. 39.) 19 Plaintiff’s complaint alleges several California Labor Code violations against 20 Defendants Tapestry, Inc., Kate Spade, LLC, and Stuart Weitzman IP, LLC. (ECF No. 1- 21 2, Ex. A.) Omitting the reimbursement of business expenses claim,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.