People v. Budd
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank H. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant was convicted, under the provisions of section 26 of the statute of 1911, designated and known as the “Juvenile Court Law” (Stats. 1911, pp. 658-672), of the crime of “encouraging, causing and contributing to the dependency” of one Mamie Gianniattasio, a female person, under the age of 21 years.
This appeal is brought to this court by the defendant from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The document charging the offense for which the defendant was prosecuted and of which he was adjudged guilty is an ordinary complaint or deposition, verified…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Tulare v. HevrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. Sacramento Butchers' Protective Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Matter of Application of WestenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Union Ice Co. v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Andrews v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Neville v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Blackmarr v. City Court of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. GiminianiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.