Union Ice Co. v. Rose
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for writ of prohibition to the Police Court of the City of Los Angeles. H. H. Rose, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prevent the police court of the city of Los Angeles and H. H. Rose, a judge thereof, from proceeding further in the prosecution of an action of the people of the state of Cali forma against the petitioners upon a criminal charge of violating the provisions of an act of the legislature of the state of California, approved March 23, 1907 (Stats. 1907, p. 984), ■commonly known and designated as the “Cartwright Law.” Petitioners hase their application upon two grounds: First, that the act in question fails to designate the offense described…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Cody v. MurpheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Rauer v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. Sacramento Butchers' Protective Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- In Re WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- In Re HumphreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- State v. ToyMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. BuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.