Legal Opinion
Blackmarr v. City Court of Salt Lake City
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1934No. 5025PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELIAS HANSEN, Justice.
The sole question presented in this case is the constitutionality of Comp. Laws Utah 1917, § 3287, which provides:
“Every society, whether domestic or foreign, now transacting business in this state, within ninety days after the passage of this chapter, and every such society hereafter applying for admission, shall before being licensed, appoint in writing the commissioner of insurance and his successors in office to be its true and lawful attorney, upon whom all legal process in any action or proceeding against it shall be served, and in such writing shall agree that any…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Ozan Lumber Co. v. Union County Nat. Bank of LibertySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Hill v. RaeMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lyte v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Blackmarr v. City Court of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Lyte v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Wright v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1943