State v. Kirby
South Dakota Supreme Court
Two original proceedings by the State against Tee Kirby; one charging contempt of court, the other seeking disbarment, tried together by consent.
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.
Based upon one alleged wrongful act, the two above-entitled matters were brought before this court; the one charging the defendant with being guilty of contempt of this court, the other charging him with dishonorable and unprofessional conduct as an attorney and counselor at law. Both proceedings were, by mutual consent, heard at one and the same time: The charges against the defendant and respondent (hereinafter known as defendant) were, in substance, that: He had, during all the times mentioned, been and now was a regularly licensed and practicing attorney of this state. The Daily Capital…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
- State v. Frew & HartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- In Re the Discipline of KunkleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re GorsuchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re the Discipline of LaceySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- In re EganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.