Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Burr
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 17, 1824PublishedCited by 254 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
22 U.S. 529 (1824)
9 Wheat. 529
Ex parte BURR.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 16, 1824.
March 17, 1824.
Mr. Emmett moved for a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue to the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, commanding that Court to restore one Burr, an attorney of that Court, who had been suspended from practice for one year, by order of that Court.[a]
2Opinion of the Court · MarshallChief Justice Marshall
This is a motion for a mandamus to the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, to restore Mr. Burr to his place of attorney at the bar of that Court.
It is a very unusual application, on which the Court has felt…
3Cited by254 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re SibleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Glatter v. MrozCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.