Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Stillwater County
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1929No. Nos. 6,364, 6,371PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AIR. JUSTICE MATTHEWS
delivered the opinion of the court.
In October, 1927, Clarence Hicks, Jr., brought action against Stillwater County on two alleged causes of action. His complaint alleges, as to each thereof, that at all times mentioned therein the defendant was a municipal corporation or subdivision of the state, and that plaintiff' was the duly elected, qualified, and acting county surveyor thereof.
As a first cause of action, the complaint alleges that, in order to perform the duties imposed upon plaintiff, “it was and is necessary that he be provided * * s with a surveyor’s instrument…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- People Ex Rel. Satterlee v. . Board of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Kehn v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Brundy v. CanbyMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Santa Cruz County v. McKnightArizona Supreme Court · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith Engineering Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Murphy v. SheftelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Grady v. City of LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1943
- Chicago Fraternal Life Ins. Ass'n v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Meyer v. LemleyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.