Legal Opinion
Smith Engineering Co. v. Rice
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1938No. 8400, 8401PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appeal has been taken from a decree dismissing a suit brought by Smith Engineering Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, hereinafter referred to as the company, to foreclose a mechanics lien on real property in Montana, and from a judgment for plaintiff in an action brought by Laurel Oil and Refining Company, hereinafter called the refiner, against the company and American Surety Company of New York, hereinafter called the surety, to recover damages for breach of two contracts, hereafter called the contract and the supplemental contract, made and entered into by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Miller v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Raymond W. Snider v. Dr. MelindezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. PursleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Michael Frank MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Donna Robertson v. Patrolman F. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Jesse J. Avila, Guardian Ad Litem of Daniel Cardona v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.