Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Sheftel

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1932No. Docket No. 8172PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

As theresult of negotiations which commenced in February, 1926, plaintiffs in April of the same year purchased from defendants a lot fronting on Washington Street in San Francisco upon which was situated a three-story frame building containing fifteen two-room apartments, and paid therefor the sum of $55,000. Previous to the transfer to plaintiffs the premises had been leased by defendants for a term of years commencing on March 1, 1926, to a tenant, who agreed to pay a monthly rental of $502.50. The court found that plaintiffs in April, 1926, through the lessee mentioned, entered…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Topolewski v. Plankinton Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Swan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Klinker v. KlinkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API