Rice v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
Donald A. Tenenbaum and Allen Ruby for Real Parties in Interest.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Section 24755 of the Business and Professions Code requires that a manufacturer or brand owner file with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (department) a minimum price schedule for distilled spirits which bear the brand name of the owner (subds. (a), (c)), and it prohibits an off-sale retail licensee from selling at less than that prescribed price (subd. (f)). 1 23In this proceeding, we are called upon to decide whether this provision and the regulations of the department implementing it (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 4, § 99, subd. (a)) conflict with the Sherman Antitrust…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- 324 Liquor Corp. v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- King v. MeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.