Legal Opinion
Tobin v. Michigan Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 3, 2005No. Nos. 03-12737, 03-12738 and 03-12739PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiffs Mark Andrew Tobin, Helen J. Hunter, and Craig Mackay (the “plaintiffs”) leased vehicles from Ford Motor Company or a Ford subsidiary (collectively “Ford”)1 and now seek to recover under an insurance policy that defendant Michigan Mutual Insurance Company (“Michigan Mutual”) issued to Ford. Because Ford and Michigan Mutual, as the contracting parties, agreed that the policy was not intended to cover retail lessees of Ford, the district court reformed the policy between Ford and Michigan Mutual to exclude medical payment and uninsured motorist…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Meier Ex Rel. Meier v. Sun International Hotels, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Pardo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Excelsior Ins. Co. v. Pomona Park Bar & Package StoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Silverberg v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- McMahan v. TotoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Horowitch v. DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Daewoo Motor America, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Penzer v. Transportation InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Bank of New York v. Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc. (In Re Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Michael Anthony ConageCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.