Legal Opinion
Pardo v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 26, 1992No. 78318PublishedCited by 262 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
596 So.2d 665 (1992)
James Antonio PARDO, etc., Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 78318.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 26, 1992.
Clayton R. Kaeiser of Kaeiser & Potolsky, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Anita J. Gay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
BARKETT, Justice.
We have for review State v. Pardo, 582 So.2d 1225 (Fla.3d DCA 1991), in which the district court certified express and direct conflict with Kopko v. State, 577 So.2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), and certified the following question of great public importance:[1]
Where a child victim's…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Wheeler v. MeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Van Pelt v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- State v. HayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Stanfill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by262 opinions
- Flagg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Nader v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- McMahan v. TotoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Jones v. United Space Alliance, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
257 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.