Legal Opinion

Silverberg v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 25, 1983No. 81-6082PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge:

This case is an appeal from a jury verdict in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The jury returned a special verdict finding the defendants, Hubert T. Houston and Paine, Web-ber, Jackson and Curtis, Inc. (“Paine Web-ber”), jointly liable for violations of Section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. § 777 (2)), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Commission, and Section 517.-301(l)(b) of the Florida Securities Act (Fla. Stat.Ann. § 517.301).…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. BernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 Margaret R. Bruschi v. Ken Brown, Elmco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Twiss v. KuryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. District of Columbia v. TulinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. In Re General Coffee Corporation, Debtor. City National Bank of Miami and City National Bank Corporation v. General Coffee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API